A few days ago
IzNice

Can someone answer this math questoin?!?!?

If someone could answer this math problem i’d be greatful. i’d like a step by step way to answer it too plz. no links!

l t l > l 2t-6 l

the “l”s are absolute values

Top 3 Answers
A few days ago
Anonymous

Favorite Answer

Absolute values can be a bear to work with – never moreso than in questions like this one. You have to realize that the absolute value is really two functions smushed together into one, and you have to treat those functions separately to solve them correctly. When you have a single absolute value in an equation, you actually have two equations. When there are two, as here, then you have four equations to deal with, any or all of which may have valid solutions.

Remember: |x| means either x for x >= 0 or it means -x for x < 0. We have to do that to your equation. Start with the t: t > |2t – 6| for t >=0 and -t > |2t – 6| for t < 0 Let's start with the first one: t > |2t – 6| for t >= 0

That means

t > 2t – 6 for t >= 0 and 2t-6 >=0

or

t > -(2t – 6) for t >= 0 and 2t – 6 < 0 Note that we now have two sets of three inequalities to solve for. Start with the first set: t > 2t – 6, t >= 0, 2t – 6 >= 0

6 > t , t >= 0; t >= 3

So we need numbers that are simultaneously less than 6, greater than or equal to 0 and greater than or equal to 3. For the second two, it’s necessary that the numbers be greater than or equal to 3. Add in the 6 > t and we have a solution set of

3 <= t < 6 Now the second one: t > -(2t – 6), t >= 0, 2t – 6 < 0 t > -2t + 6, t >= 0, t < 3 3t > 6, t >= 0, t < 3 t > 2, t >= 0, t < 3 This comes together making 2 < t < 3 Add that to our first solution and we have 2 < t < 6 Now we have to do the same thing with the second set. I'm going to let you do it, following this example. Please be aware that it's perfectly possible that the second set will yield no useful answers, so this may turn out to be our only solution, although I doubt it. I know it's an irritating process, but it really does have real-world applications.

0

4 years ago
vay
permit x and x + 2 be the consecutive unusual integers. through fact the sum of their squares is 394, then x^2 + (x + 2)^2 = 394 remedy for x. x^2 + x^2 + 4x + 4 = 394 2x^2 + 4x + 4 = 394 x^2 + 2x + 2 = 197 x^2 + 2x – 195 = 0 (x + 15)(x – 13) = 0 consequently, x = {-15, 13} This makes 2 pairs of consecutive integers: -15, -13 13, 15 x^2 + 5x – 390 = 0
0

A few days ago
blah
l -t l > l -6 l

or

l t l > l 6 l

0