Wiki is sweet if your looking for a information basis or develop a (foundation) for your research. Yahoo! is great for opinions or information source feed back. Copernic is great for indepth research as it will go outside the box in most cases with its massive web crawlers that span many search sites including Yahoo, Google ext…

lol, anyways Copernic is free to download at Copernic.com if your looking to get outside the “box” and sumise your searches…for thos of you stuck in the box.

2 points, yippy! ill nvr use em. anybody want my points?

In summary, this site is definitely not better or worse than wikipedia. It is an exchange site where we give our sincere insights and not only for the sake of 2 points but sometimes we get more kicks. whereas , wikipedia is one-sided non-responsive but great site to gather info. Wikipedia is like a library, where Y!A is like a convention.

And yes, there are a few that will add sleazy remarks just to attain points.

This site can only be as good as the people that use it.

They put so many cookies into the machines they won’t work.

Everyone complains that over two web sites and the computer is frozen solid. Yet, here it doesn’t do that no one is putting cookies into my computer and freezeing it up.

It is very discourageing I wanted to read what the diet from the bible would be like, just curious. They wanted my E mail address my home address and by the time I put it in there it was so locked up I never did get to see the diet. But I imageine now I will get tons of junk mail about it.

Don’t they realize that discourages people from surfing the net?

But, yeah, I think the whole idea of yahoo answers is defeated when people just get their answers from wikipedia.

It’s like the helpful friend of the internet.