A few days ago
erictheredii

Was there a February 29, 1900? First to explain correctly gets best answer.?

Was there a February 29, 1900? First to explain correctly gets best answer.?

Top 10 Answers
A few days ago
Anonymous

Favorite Answer

This day never actually occurred on the Gregorian calendar in which 1900 is not a leap year. February 29 is also known as bissextile day. A year which has a February 29 is, by definition, a leap year. This date occurs only every four years, in years evenly divisible by 4, such as 1988, 1996, 2008 or 2024, with the exceptions in century years not divisible by 400, such as 1900.
1

6 years ago
Sutherland
This Site Might Help You.

RE:
Was there a February 29, 1900? First to explain correctly gets best answer.?

0

A few days ago
Pat S
No there was not. Many of the answers above are correct. A centennial year must be divisible by 400 in order for it to be a leap year.

The reason is that even with leap years every four years, we’d still be a little off in our days over a long period of time. The earth travels around the sun every 365.242199 days, which is a solar year. As you can see, a solar year is slightly shorter than a calendar year, which is 365.25 days.

Due to this, an additional adjustment to the calendar was necessary. Eliminating leap years in centennial years not divisible by 400 (1700, 1800, 1900, 2100, etc.) was the adjustment made.

1

4 years ago
?
1900 Calendar
0

A few days ago
Will D
Although the calendar recognized by western cultures indeed says no, it depends on where in the world you were at, at that point in history!!

Although the leap day of a leap year being February 29th is widely recognized, some more historical cultures had their leap day earlier in the month of February. Based on the old Roman calendar that the 23rd of February was the last day of their “calendar” year – they inserted February 24th as their leap day. Thus giving them the same effect as our leap day still does today, which is merely to adjust the time and calendar with the rotation of the Earth.

Having that said, it emphatically depends on where you were on the date in question, because the European Union didn’t recognize the date February 29th as a date, or the leap date until the year 2000. So, to some parts of the world, it never existed to even be a date until then!

0

A few days ago
Anonymous
No, and I just am adding what the H*** was that one dude’s point supposed to be? Explaining that other places didn’t use Feb 29th and some didn’t recognize it has nothing to do with the fact that those that DID recognize Feb 29th STILL didn’t recognize it that year. I mean if Feb 29th had been in existence in SOME places that year the point could have been made, but when even THOSE places didn’t have a Feb 29th that year the whole point was MOOT.
0

A few days ago
?
Nope. In the Reformed Gregorian calendar that we use, Aloysius Giglio decided to make every fourth year a leap year, for accuracy in the long term… except century years. “Century years can leap only when divisible by four hundred, as in the years 1600 and 2000.”

Very cool, dude!

1

5 years ago
?
Water
0

A few days ago
Anonymous
Yes. 1900 was a leap year.
0

A few days ago
Patty
No. A century year is a leap year only if it can be divided by 400.
4