A few days ago
aspie_goth_girl

Will an IQ of 93 result in consistent and perpetual failure?

I had received an aptitude testing score of 93. Do psychometric procedures HAVE to be applied to those such as myself who cannot acquiesce due to the fact that there was no prior knowledge of the procedure? I had not been informed of what it was I had intended to undergo, however, I had attempted to excel. Subsequently I realized it was the WASI (Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence), and was required on the condition that I wish to receive my IEP for Home Bound instruction (as I am indeed a person ‘with’ Asperger’s). I had presumed of my cognitive faculties being capable of being employed limitlessly, although had my ‘intelligence’ merely been a product of excellent rote learning ability? I had received the test upon the age of 13, and am currently 16 years of age. Is the WASI unreliable, and could I possibly be substantially more intelligent than this evaluation administered by my school psychologist had ‘attempted’ to determine?

Top 7 Answers
A few days ago
Anonymous

Favorite Answer

Nope. To your main question, that is.

Tests aren’t 100% dependable, especially since many people, as you’ve pointed out, have had the advantage of knowing in advance the format of IQ tests. The validity of IQ tests has itself been hotly contested amongst academics, and they’re still divided over the issue.

So not to worry – universities don’t look at IQ test scores. If you’re anxious on that account, you may safely put your fears to rest.

My advice: Forget the score – it’s essentially devoid of meaning. You don’t have to be a genius to succeed in life, or even smart. In the real world, it’s diligence and willpower that matters.

Either way, work hard, and just remember that a little common sense dashed with a good helping of faith in one’s abilities can go a long way.

Wishing you all the best,

T.

0

A few days ago
anobium625
You received many answers telling you that IQ tests are fallible and you may be more intelligent than your test indicated. I agree.

But no one seems to have made the point that there are millions of productive people who happen to have an intelligence that is fairly represented by a “93.” If your test was accurate, and you are less intelligent than some other people, all that means is that you must work a little harder than they do to achieve the same result. There are also a great many essential human characteristics besides intelligence, and you may be well above the norm in these.

I’ll join the chorus now. Forget that test and get on with life. What you’ve done in the last couple years is a much better indicator of what you will do in the next two years than any test you took at age 13.

Best wishes!!

1

A few days ago
Gin Martini
To answer the topic question: No. I do not think an explanation is needed.

Which version of the test did you receive? There is a variant of the test for persons under the age of 16: the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC, 7-16 yrs). Do not put too much faith into one test.

Perhaps the test is not appropriate for someone with Asperger’s. This is definately something that I would investigate. It may be an improper testing instrument for you.

Moreover, the quality of your writing is quite good, which would suggest (to me anyway) that your intelligence is above 100.

1

A few days ago
Anonymous
The whole concept of IQ has been called into question lately. How can you quantify a persons inteligence or aptitude with a single number. Ronald Reagan was a wiz at working with people, but only believed the earth was not flat because people he trusted told him so. Einstein figured out relativity, but could not gain the respect of his own children.

Your writing is clear and understandable, but a bit wordy. for example;

“I had received the test upon the age of 13, and am currently 16 years of age”

would read better if it said

I took the test when I was 13. I am currently 16 years old.

1

A few days ago
Bruce J
One, it’s just a test. You may want to retake it.

Two, you seem very well spoken and intelligent.

Three….well, George W. Bush is president, and that man can’t have an I.Q. over 80. So, I’d say that there is definately hope for you.

4

A few days ago
daljack -a girl
I believe I.Q. tests are flawed and from the wording of your question I think yours was.

Put aside the “number” you were given and strive to be a success……I think you have a wonderful chance….good luck.

1

A few days ago
Anonymous
why do you need to rely on test to tell you how smart you are , if you truly are smart than f*** the test
0