A few days ago
tots and fries

Can YOu help me?

Employers are denying a growing number of workers access to Facebook, the now ubiquitous social networking site, a Sophos Latest News about Sophos survey shows. The poll queried 600 visitors to the Sophos Web site over a period of weeks earlier this summer.

Some 43 percent said they had been denied access to Facebook at work. Another 7 percent said that access to the site was strictly limited to professional use.

Surprising Findings

Despite the productivity drain that Web 2.0 sites can cause, Sophos researchers were surprised by the number of employers specifically banning Facebook. “As recently as last September, we didn’t have any companies blocking Web 2.0 applications,” Sophos security Webroot AntiSpyware 30-Day Free Trial. Click here. consultant Ron O’Brien told TechNewsWorld.

There are a number of reasons for companies’ reluctance to block these sites. For starters, human resource departments are increasingly using Facebook and MySpace Latest News about MySpace as tools for researching potential hires. Also, Facebook is becoming a potent networking tool Free white paper on customer satisfaction metrics. Click here. for people over 30. Some companies refrained from curtailing access to the site due to fear of employee backlash, according to some respondents to the Sophos survey.

Lost Productivity

Still, it is clear that a growing number of employers don’t see these reasons as compelling enough to allow access to the Web site. It does suck productivity from a workplace, O’Brien acknowledged. “There are very few job descriptions that require access to the Internet Over 800,000 High Quality Domains Available For Your Business. Click Here.. I know most people say they need it for work — but in reality, most employees can do their jobs with the office network and systems, and don’t have to have access to the Internet.”

Privacy and security — both for employees and companies — are other reasons cited for blocking access. However, banning Facebook at work does not prevent employees from spilling corporate secrets, even unwittingly, via their home computers.

The same is true for employees’ privacy, O’Brien acknowledged. Companies motivated by these reasons may find that protecting employees from themselves is a futile effort.

Friendly Plastic Frog

The reason Sophos focused on Facebook for its survey, O’Brien said, is that the company had just completed another study to determine how willing site users were to share personal information with strangers. Sophos set up a profile on Facebook for a plastic frog, and then set about getting people to accept the frog as their friend and give it their personal information.

A shocking 43 percent of people contacted by the frog allowed it to view their profiles, which contained all sorts of private information.

“Facebook is a tool that requires a certain amount of dexterity to use,” O’Brien concluded — both at home and in the office.

Top 5 Answers
A few days ago
Anonymous

Favorite Answer

You didn’t ask a question. What sort of help do you need with this?
0

5 years ago
?
When I was a Christian, my belief was that God was omnipotent, and that the concept of “free will” (which is where I think most people get the idea that he is not) is basically like those books where you can pick A, B, or C and are brought to a different page based on that choice… but in this case, the end result will always be the same (if you’re destined for Heaven, you will go to Heaven… if you’re destined for Hell, you will go to Hell… you cannot change that, because your path has already been chosen… that sort of thing). It was also my belief that Satan had the power to do anything, but within the confines of what God would allow him to do (same abilities, except that God was more powerful). I would not say that he needed permission… more that if God said no, he couldn’t do something (you don’t need permission to steal, but if you get caught you’ve got to give back the stolen item and are likely to be punished for it… get it?). I had never considered whether or not the Devil would have free will. I would think so, in roughly the same sense that I believed we had free will… but my concept of free will (as you’ve seen) is not the same as most (there are x number of choices… and they all lead you to the same place… as opposed to their being infinite choices which can lead you to any number of destinations). But take what I say with a grain of salt, as I no longer call myself Christian (but I am not an atheist). EDIT: I feel I should elaborate on comparing the Devils will to theft… a thief who is caught is not always punished… sometimes what was stolen is ultimately unimportant, so nobody cares… God always knows what’s going on, but does not always act on it, because he does not always care (but then… one must wonder “if God cannot look upon sin, how does he know what the Devil is doing, since the Devil is essentially “sin itself”… so to speak).
0

A few days ago
Stephanie S
To be honest I’m not a computer person. I read, write, look at T.V. and that wear I normally stop. I don’t be knowing what really any more. I guess I’m afraid I get confuse alot and I’m afraid to ask question.
0

A few days ago
sewcute594
I don’t understand your questions.
0

A few days ago
Anonymous
ummmm…okay…first of all, ure crazy if u think someone’s gonna sit down and actually read all of this. second of all, what are you asking??????
0