As others have answered, the sound in these cases is a /z/.

But I’m guessing you don’t want simply to know about these five words. You want to know WHY that is so, and how you can tell in other cases.

There is one basic rule:

When an “s” is added to make a noun plural (ones) or possessive (one’s), or to create a singular verb form OR when it results from a contraction (“he’s” “she’s” “how’s” for “he is” “she is”, “how is”)

a) it is pronounced with the /s/ sound — that is, WITHOUT using the voice– IF the SOUND (not the letter) immediately before it does not use the voice.

Examples: after f, k, p, t

*its, it’s, bites, lacks, caps

b) it is pronounced with the /z/ sound — that is, the same as /s/ but WITH the voice– when the SOUND immediately before it is “voiced” (that is, uses the voice)

Note that the voiced sound may be a VOWEL sound (ALL vowel sounds in English use the voice), or a voiced consonant — b, d, g, l, m, n, r, v

Examples:

*all the cases you list! the first three are after vowel sounds, the last two after /n/, which uses the voice

(Note again, that it is the SOUND made before the “s” that makes the difference — thus the SILENT vowel of “bites” doesn’t have any effect, while the pronunciation of a vowel sound in the possessive form “dress’s” [pronounced /dressiz/] causes the following “s” to be voiced… /z/)

_________________

Actually, there is a more general rule like the one above —

For ANY word with just one “s” at the end, it will be pronounced as /z/ if the preceding sound is voiced, as /s/ if the preceding sound is not voiced. (That’s because, words with final /s/ sound following a voiced sound spell it other ways

a) with DOUBLE s (after a vowel), e.g., dress, miss, fuss, boss

b) with final -se or -ce (after a vowel or consonant), e.g.. base, house, nice, sense, horse, fence, since, glance (though SOME words with these endings sound like /z/ – house (verb), ease, please, disease, noise, poise)

Those are all pronounced with a ‘z’ sound. Also, there is no difference in pronunciation between “one’s” and “ones”.

you should pronounce it as z sound

provided that I unquestionably have stated lots of the cost reductions approaches of nuclear skill, for sure i don’t think of that it fairly is with the aid of nature communist/socialist. I ahve additionally stated which you decrease earnings taxes with the aid of the quantity you opt for for to enhance carbon taxes, so i don’t think of it fairly is socialist the two. As for having the administrative.use autos that are greater costly, I probable does not help this, yet i might honestly help the administrative.figuring out on say e-autos in the event that they might show that the lifetime value is decrease. Now you have stated alot of recommendations that i might regularly be in desire of. those recommendations, in spite of the fact that are actually not the CO2 tax or cap and commerce recommendations basically located through fact the tip-all-be all of AGW recommendations. the sorrowful certainty that maximum of your warmer compatriots are unwilling to confess is that the taxing recommendations will in basic terms get us area of how there in any case. So what’s needed? greater taxes? A one international gov’t form of regulation on all international places? those are the socialist plans that have many screaming. How ’bout rather hitting the source, coal? dropping the subsidies on coal giving leases and greater govt land for nuclear plant progression, etc. etc. discover smart approaches of doing this. And sure the loose industry physique of recommendations of dropping subsidies may be a large start up. the biggest project that the Dems look too dense to get is the economics of the finished element. while taxes are diminished contained in the US, greater gross revenues is generated. which means we are taxed at too intense of a cost. basic math skill that in case you tax $a million trilllion at 50%, you will not arise to $a million.2 trillion at 40 two%. much less taxes propose greater money flow from the two interior the rustic and out of doorways. purely placed the politicians are too stupid to attain that increasing taxes won’t restoration the deficit. yet they have mistakenly aimed there costs at the two AGW and taxation to cut back the deficit. i might fairly choose for to work out the dems placed up a invoice like what you’re suggesting. i might fairly choose for to work out the repubs unquestionably kill a invoice that will enhance nuclear skill use. it shouldn’t happen. So my question is why the heaters have been suggesting socialist recommendations rather of your plenty greater actual looking, plenty greater unquestionably obtainable recommendations, and albeit plenty greater effective recommendations?

with a z sound

that’s how it’s pronounced, so yes

they do pronounce it right

z

“Z” Sound.

z.