A few days ago
doublel_79

Identify the order relation between two integers?

I have to give a 10-15 min teaching demonstration on Monday to my class on this topic and I am not sure what they are asking. Please point me in the right direction

Top 2 Answers
A few days ago
Numbie

Favorite Answer

Integers include zero and negative numbers.

That’s an add-on: first consider strictly positive integers.

The deal here is “big and little,” which is a big deal.

What makes it a big deal is that everybody knows about big and little, and that means everybody knows something really important about mathematics.

In math-speak, the order relation between positive integers is “little comes before big.”

The natural parallel is that kids are little *before* they are big.

Zero is easy: littler than littlest is nothing.

Negative numbers are trouble.

What mathematics gives you is machinery to deal with trouble.

The mathematics “machine” that handles negative numbers is “the number line.”

On the number line, the order relation among positive integers is “left comes before right.”

Mathematics is about “extending ideas.”

The left-comes-before-right idea “extends” to the entire number line.

Mathematics often produces surprises.

The surprise that comes from extending left-before-right to negative numbers is that negative-big comes before negative-little.

And 0>-1, which is a surprise if it says that zilch is bigger than something, but not a surprise if it says that zilch is bigger than less-than-nothing.

Maybe it’s illuminating to divide the number line into three regions: nothing, something, less-than-nothing?

An important idea is that the order relation between integers is “transitive.”

What it means:

if A

0

4 years ago
Anonymous
Your situation isn’t for sure reported. i think of the project skill “define the kin < and > on the integers, and supply examples.” i do no longer understand what point of sophistication you’re coping with, yet i’ve got faith that’s a mid-point ordinary classification. if so, I advise you employ here DEFINITION. If m and n are integers and m isn’t equivalent to n, then we are saying “m is way less that n” (and we write “m < n") if and provided that there exists a favorable integer p such that m + p = n. besides, we are saying "n is better than m" (and write "n > m”) if and provided that m < n. The above definition right this moment admits the very impoortant theorem, time-venerated because of the fact the Trichotomy regulation: THEOREM. If m and n are integers, then one and easily between here holds: (a million) m = n , (2) m < n , (3) m > n . you could actually fill 10 – quarter-hour by way of giving examples. warning: there’s a logical pitfall right here, The above definition assumes the class already is familiar with what a favorable integer is, and that they are able to easily understand that in the event that they already understand something approximately an “order relation.” extremely, n is a favorable integer if and provided that n > 0. stable success.
0