A few days ago
Anonymous

Why is school teaching about Ceasar Chavez and Booker T. Washington before George Washington?

My daughter is in kindergarten. She has come home with “social studies” work from class that I don’t know what to make of. Last week she came home with a paper all about Caesar Chavez. It confused me because she has not come home with anything about George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, or anybody that has had anything to do with founding the USA!! I wanted to call the school board, but I thought I would give them one more chance. Today my daughter comes home with a paper on Booker T. Washinton. I am all for learning about other races, religions, culture, etc, but why is my daughter learning about these people BEFORE the founders of this great nation!!

Top 5 Answers
A few days ago
litteyfreak

Favorite Answer

It’s all about having a multicultural education, which promotes a sense of respect and understanding of other cultures. Booker T. Washington was very much a part of American history, and deserves to be taught, and Caesar Chavez has done a lot for his people. Only teaching about WASPs does not promote acceptance at all, but only perpetuates America’s extreem case of xenophilia and ethnocentrism.

If you are really concerned about fitting all of American (and world) history into a kindergarten class, you should call her teacher or the principal before you bother the school board (who does not necessarily determine the curriculum).

0

A few days ago
Anonymous
I dont think history needs to be linear at all. Because, then your daughter should be learning about the crusades, spanish inquisition, Hammurabi’s code, Lutheranism/the Reformation, and the magna carta first. Believe it or not, these things all had great influence on American History before Paine, Henry, Allen, Washington, Jefferson, and Madison.
0

A few days ago
donkeyrinser
This is an excellent question! Thank you for submitting it.

This approach is taken in order gear our youth for the “culture wars” which unfortunately dominate public debate, cable news, congressional hearings and ultimately exhaust time in the class room formerly reserved for Washington’s warnings of “foreign entanglements” and Lincoln request to find “the better angels of our nature”.

It is not done maliciously nor is it intended to brainwash or tilt one race against another. However, the effects of limiting time and discussion of our nation’s founders has had a eroding effect of our national identity, our principles and our civil rights.

1

A few days ago
Lost
I don’t know why. I learned about nothing but American history for almost my entire school career. Then in my last I had to cram about 4 years worth of World History in less than a month. In my opinion, it breeds arrogance, which we have an abundance of.

I think students should go from the beginning of history to the present day. It makes more sense to me.

0

5 years ago
idell
I went to school in Australia. Mr. Washington was not a major or even minor subject of study. However we did learn something of him, mostly that he was the military leader of the American revolution and the first president of the USA. I never really believed the story of the cherry tree, though I’ll admit it could have been true.
0