How about this:

1) Trading allows societies to achieve a division of labor, whereby individuals are allowed to specialize in certain areas (such as blacksmithing or farming), and then trade their goods produced with others for the things they need. With a division of labor, we receive several wonderful benefits. a) A division of labor allows for experts to be created. With a division of labor, people can specialize at what they do best and become even better, thus instead of a person having to divide his time between growing crops, sewing clothes, and blacksmithing his tools, he can focus only on the blacksmithing and become an excellent blacksmith creating many more tools of a much higher quality then he could have otherwise had the skills or the time to create. b) a division of labor also creates a higher effecency, because by working on only a single skill, individuals become faster and more adept at that skill, and thus mor blacksmithing, farming, or sewing is completed per person than would otherwise be possible without trading.

2) Trading allows people in different areas to enjoy goods and items that cannot be created or produced in their areas, thus inland people can enjoy fish while coastal people could enjoy gold or bear fur.

3) Trading creates a way for people of vastly different backgrounds to interact peacefully without violence. Thus the different cultures can interact and the unique ideas of the different peoples are mixed and the two peoples can grow intellectually and socially.

Hope that helps some!

Some other ideas about trade are:

It provided for the people learning the languages and culture of other places.

It brought food that was not grown in that area and food that was out of season.

It helped with the learning of foreign languages.

Food could be imported fro other lands when there was a famine.

It spread ideas about religion, art , music, literature, science, math and writing.

The coverage of appeasement replaced right into a contributing element to the outbreak of worldwide conflict II through fact it replaced into used against an opponent(Hitler) whose instantaneous objectives blanketed domination of Europe. Any act of appeasement stood little possibility of enjoyable him . He might consistently choose extra. as a count of fact particular acts of appeasement did infuriate him alongside with while it not on time his paying for Czechoslovakia. as quickly as France and England got here to the perception that Hitler ought to no longer be negotiated with they drew the line interior the sand (ensuring Poland’s sovereignty) that kicked of WWII. maximum possibly if that they had acted decisively 2-3 years before they might have stopped Hitler without the prospect of a protracted and intense priced conflict. Why did no longer countries attempt to end Hitler: nicely different countries did no longer choose to get to conflict with them on condition that they have been nevertheless convalescing from WWI, i’m extraordinarily beneficial they might choose to do something so they chosen peace and have been hoping they might end taking on issues, yet they have been incorrect and later took over France a efficient u . s . in Europe and there is the place a huge conflict began and so on. maximum countries on the time of the conflict have been particularly susceptible, with the exceptions of Germany, the U. S. and the Soviet Union. Germany made a peace %. with the Soviets that stored them out of the conflict. Germany additionally had many allies in Italy. countless the countries he invaded had to safeguard their land no longer to point scuffling with him from taking on lots of Europe. purely Google the bloody questions and you gets good solutions!