A few days ago
Anonymous

Bill of Rights Case — HELP?

In my us history class, we need to create an arguement for a case that was given to us and we are required to use the bill of rights to back it up. Which amendment in the bill of rights goes with the following case? Im sooo confused!!

Case #5

In order to lessen the effect of drunken drivers, the state of Michigan instituted the idea of “Sobriety Check Lanes.” The concept involves setting up road blocks along certain high risk areas where a number of drunk driving accidents have occurred. Officers at these road blocks would stop you, ask you a number of questions, informally search your vehicle with probable cause, and subject you to a possible sobriety check (either manually or machine) to determine if you have been drinking. If you do not pass the test, or refuse to take the test (for whatever reason), you will be taken into custody and your car impounded.

I need to explain the amendment behind it, so please help =]

Top 5 Answers
A few days ago
Anonymous

Favorite Answer

The fourth amendment. It goes like this:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

In other words, before a policeman can stop you and search you, or your car, he must have a warrant issued by a judge, and to get the warrant he must swear that he has probable cause to suspect that you have committed a crime. And the warrant has to describe the place to be searched and also just what the cop is looking for.

We have a principle in the US that by applying for a driver’s license you are giving ‘implied consent’ that if a cop suspects you are drunk he may test you. But he still has to have some reason to suspect you are drunk! In this case the cop has no reason to suspect that you’re drunk, he’s just stopping people at random and searching their car, which is unconstitutional.

Also, often police will set up these checkpoints in minority neighborhoods or poor neighborhoods, just assuming that poor or minority people are more likely to be drunk drivers or have drugs. This violates the principle of equal protection under the law, which is part of 14th amendment (though that isn’t in the Bill of Rights).

1

A few days ago
peaceablefruit206
This process is backed by the 10th amendment. This amendment give the power of states and people, and it says , “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.”

In a nutshell, this is saying that in matters that where there are not federal legislature about a matter, the individual states or the people can pass laws that apply only to the states or people. This is true with your case since is talking about something that is going to be done only in Michigan.

0

A few days ago
jimdotedu
Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Searching someone’s car w/o “probable cause” (reasonable suspicion of finding something to indicate he broke the law) is prohibited.

IF you go through a checkpoint for license and inspection AND an officer smells alcohol on your breath, it’s probably cause. (so keep your window rolled up)

1

A few days ago
TuretzSR
This looks to me like a fourth amendment issue.

Good luck with your class assignment!

1

A few days ago
TheSlayor
Have you not read the Bill of Rights?

If you don’t know what your rights are, how are you going to know when the government is violating them?

0