It’s not just grammar, but also a little bit of usage that could help your question sound better. My suggestion would be to rephrase it a little bit.

“I’ve never really been interested in politics, but I find myself becoming more and more interested every day. I would like to find books that would help me to understand politics more deeply. Do you know of any in particular that could help me?”

That basically says the whole thing. Your grammar isn’t too far off the mark, it’s just the mechanics and usage that could use a bit of work.

It’s not bad only it’s over-done and needs a simpler vocabulary.

I’ve never really been into politics but I’m becoming more interested everyday. I’d like to know if there are any good books out there that will help me understand politics.

It’s good grammar for someone who’s first language isn’t english. Some notes: Second line is not a question, “Political arena” refers to actually being in politics and “savvy” is a British slang word that isn’t used in formalized communication. Even the vocabulary is good, the words aren’t wrong but not the best ones to get the message across.

Its alright, but this would sound better:

Are there any books that will help me to understand the art of politics?

I’ve never really been into politics, but I’m becoming more interested everyday. I’d like to know if there are any savvy books out there that will help me to understand politics better.

Ummmm I’m kind of feeling blah right now, but I think for the last sentence, you could change it to:

“I was wondering if there are any books out there that will better help me understand politics?”

It’s not the best example, but it’s a bit simpler and more conversational, if that’s what you were aiming for.

“Who, me” could be o.k. on the grounds that the two words are pronouns. 2d one merits an ‘F’, as nicely as being despatched decrease back to the text textile e book to income what a pronoun is by using the fact the element buzzed over their head the 1st time. style 3 additionally missed it by way of fact the respond is the two evasive, and grammatically incorrect. The final reaction ought to have been “You and that i are the two suitable”, the muse of the respond, besides the shown fact that, is misguided on the grounds that basically the 1st scholar gave an answer that must be termed suitable. A plural reaction by using scholar #3 is, as suggested, incorrect, on the grounds that there is basically a million answer that bears attention of being any the place close to suitable.

….to understand the art of politics?

I have…..getting more interested…..(out)delete. aid delete instead insert help (into comprehending) delete..insert to understand politics?