Feel "the Yi spread a fee" needs most to renew its[one] labor regulation in the labor legal statutes in Hong Kong.

"Terminate pay" at present, would not be able to receive until work for 2 years or above at least, but physically each employee once contributed efforts to the employer as well, paying penny power, when the company graduate, if work for not enough 2 years or above, only have end salary, New Year holidays, super hour the repair of the subsidy etc., for can only have for 2 years or above can the employee of past service just receive?

My proposal changes current"terminate pay" to receive qualifications specification at least by going the provision of"need to work to be no less than 2 years or above past service" at present, changing to "any once worked for the employer, work no matter past service how much, all can receive dismissal wage", its calculation method is similar then and before.

And when the company sends away, the employee has no income then, once paying cent power for the company as well, changing suggestion legal statutes so, I should for make no distinction between each employee.

香港勞工法例中, 覺得"遺散費"是最需要更新之一條勞工條例.感觉 " Yi 传布费用 " 最需要更新它的［一］在香港的劳动合法的法令劳动规则。

" 有结尾的薪资 " 目前，不能够接受直到 2 年的工作或者在上面至少，但是身体上地，每位职员曾经也有助于对雇主的努力，支付便士力量，当公司毕业生，如果为不充足的 2 年或者上方工作，只有结束薪水，新年假日，超级小时补助金等等的修理，因为只能为 2 年 o 有

現時"遣散費", 最少要工作2年或以上才可領取, 但實際每一位僱員也曾為僱主服務, 出一分力, 在公司結業時, 如工作不足2年或以上, 就只有最後薪金, 年假, 超時津貼等等的補償, 為可只有2年或以上年資之僱員才可領取呢?

我提議更改現行之"遣散費"最少領取資格規格, 由現時行"需工作不少於2年或以上年資"的規定, 改為"凡曾為僱主工作, 無論工作年資多少, 均可領取遣散費", 其計算方法則與以往一樣.

而且當公司遣散時, 僱員便沒有收入, 也曾為公司出分力, 這樣更改建議法例, 我應為對每一名僱員平等對待.
感觉 " Yi 传布费用 " 最需要更新它的［一］在香港的劳动合法的法令劳动规则。
感じの " Yi は布の費用を伝える " は最もホンコンで一の］をその［を更新して合法が労働する法令労働規則が要ります。

" 尾を結ぶ給料がある " 現在は、受け入れることが出来ない 2 年になっての仕事或いは上で少なくとも、しかし体の上で土、各職員はかつても役立ったに対して雇用者の努力は、力をペニー支払いする、会社の卒業生になる、もし十分ではない2 年が或いは上は働くために、ただ終わる給料がある、新年休日、スーパー時間の補助金などの修理して、o のために2 年あることしかできないだからだ
感? " Yi ?布?用 " 最需要更新它的〔一〕在香港的??合法的法令????。
感?? " Yi ?布?费用?伝?? " ?最??????一?〕???〔?更新??合法?????法令??规则?要???。

Because my English is not good, the troublesome helper translates, thanks! ! ! (10 minute) the content is as follows (about 300 characters):- In the Hong Kong laborer legal regulation, thought "loses disperses Fei" is most needs of a labor statute renewals Now "compensation for removal", most little must work for 2 years or above only then may receive, but the actual each employee also once served for the employer, leaves a force component, graduated when the company, like the work insufficient 2 years or above, only had the final salary, the new years vacation, the overtime allowance and so on compensating, for might only have 2 year or above employee of the period of service only then may receive? I proposed change present "compensation for removal" most little receives the qualifications specification, must work by presently fashionable "many to 2 year or above the period of service" stipulation, changed "every once to work for the employer, regardless of work period of service how many, might receive compensation for removal", its computation side principle and formerly was same Moreover when the company disbands, the employee has not then received, also once left the force component for the company, like this changed the suggestion legal regulation, I should for to each employee equality of treatment

Labor legislation in Hong Kong that "severance payments" is most in need of renovation a labor regulations.

Now "severance payment" to work for at least two years or more before they can receive, but each one employee had to serve the employer, a role to play in closing down of the company, such as working less than two years or more, only final salary, annual leave and overtime allowances of compensation, only to be two years or more seniority employee can receive?

I propose to change the existing "severance pay" at least eligibility requirements from the current visit "has to be not less than 2 years or more seniority", the words "to work for an employer who has, no matter how many years of service are eligible for severance pay," the method has, as in the past.

But when the company laid off employees when they will have no income, and also help the company out, a change in the proposed legislation, I have every right to be an equal treatment of employees.

這是在http://www.google.com.hk/language_tools?hl=zh-TW翻譯的，應該唔會有錯，你也可以試下，這個網很好用架。。

In the Hong Kong laborer legal regulation, thought "loses disperses
Fei" is most needs of a labor statute renewals

Now "compensation for removal", most little must work for 2 years or
above only then may receive, but the actual each employee also once
served for the employer, leaves a force component, graduated when the
company, like the work insufficient 2 years or above, only had the
final salary, the new years vacation, the overtime allowance and so on
compensating, for might only have 2 year or above employee of the
period of service only then may receive?

I proposed change present "compensation for removal" most little
receives the qualifications specification, must work by presently
fashionable "many to 2 year or above the period of service"
stipulation, changed "every once to work for the employer, regardless
of work period of service how many, might receive compensation for
removal", its computation side principle and formerly was same

Moreover when company's disbands, the employee has not then received,
also once left the force component for the company, like this changed
the suggestion legal regulation, I should for to each employee
equality of treatment

In the Hong Kong laborer legal regulation, thinks " Loses disperses spends " Is most needs of a labor statute renewals Now " Compensation for removal " Most little must work for 2 years or above only then may receive, but the actual each employee also once served for the employer, leaves a force component, graduated when the company, like the work insufficient 2 years or above, only had the final salary, the new years vacation, the overtime allowance and so on compensating, for might only have 2 year or above employee of the period of service only then may receive? I propose change present " Compensation for removal " Most little receives the qualifications specification, by presently fashionable " Must work many to 2 year or above period of service " The stipulation, changes " Every once worked for the employer, regardless of work period of service how many, might receive compensation for removal " Its computation side principle and formerly was same Moreover when the company disbands, the employee has not then received, also once left the force component for the company, like this changed the suggestion legal regulation, I should for to each employee equality of treatment