Since the vast majority of our educational institutions are influenced by the hippies of yesterday (the 1960s) when there was much revolutionary strife on campuses, these are the same students with a liberal agenda that now are the professors and head people at most of our universities. Therefore, it is no surprise that a good book on the Federalist Papers is not immediately available in most of these insitutions, since most of it doesn’t jibe with the socialist tendencies of most humanities professors.

Two good books to check out that would explain it a little better in some of their chapters are “The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution” and “The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History”. These are an easy read and are meant for the general public, not just for those in law school. They are available from amazon.com, Barnes and Noble bookstores, and other major book outlets (you might have to ask for them, but they are easy to order)

Also, you can buy the books “The Federalist Papers” and “The Anti-Federalist Papers”, even though the English would be the English of the late 1700s. However, reading them makes more sense after reading the books in the above paragraph, even though you might have a problem with the English of that period.

Basically, the Federalist Papers were written by those that were for Federalism and the Anti-Federalist Papers were by those that had a problem with it. It was a big debate during the founding of the American Republic as to how much power to give the Federal government vs. the States. Since the founders were leery of giving too much centralized power to any particular insitution after the experience with the abuse of centralized power of many monarchies that were in Europe (and, in this case, the English king), there was some contention as to how much power to give a central power such as the Federal government.

The Federalists were more for giving the Federal government more power in some areas than the anti-Federalists were. For instance, Thomas Jefferson disagreed with Madison on giving the Federal government to print money and letting the states each have their own currency, while Madison was a Federalist and contended that no standardization of the money system would lead to chaos.

Each side had some good points and there were disadvantages as well advantages to each. Today, many conservatives would claim that the Federal government has too much power and that the states should have some of the power and subsequent decision-making that the Federal government has taken away from them. In essence, this is a timely debate, which affects us even today….

Hope this helps

web pages like those are the quickest and least perplexing thank you to fail a paper this website supplies to write down your paper for money?… appears like a dumb theory to me identity recommend you to no longer do this… it sounds too unstable plus look at it this type.. they have no theory the shape of your writting so in case you write under suitable and your paper appears like it grew to become into written by means of a instructor.. yeah issues in basic terms dont upload up and thats the main crimson flag for plagerizing to instructors and plus what with reference to the artwork referred to web site how do you coach the positioning you used on your paper… hmmm? as a results of fact you wont be attentive to the place it rather is