What looks like facts to some looks like blasphemy to others.

A primary source would be a letter, photograph, art, or other document from the period or by the person concerned. A secondary source would be later research using such items.

Sources must always be examined for bias. Does the source have an agenda — a particular slant, an ax to grind? The author of the historical work must also consider whether he or she has such a bias, and make adjustments to correct it.

Fiction can be a useful look of history if it is based on sound research and documentation, and if it provides an objective, unbiased, balanced look at a historical period or personality.

2. You can look deeper into the book and probably find the meaning of life. 🙂

3. It talks about things which will never go out of fashion, e.g love, hate, money etc.

2.A very good seller (You’d have to consider the mayhem

over Harry Potter literary history)

3.The author is dead.